A structured scoring system that turns a rubric-based assessment, a competency scorecard, and a standardized interview into one ranked list with a clear evaluation summary — built for any role.
Three inputs, one score. Each candidate is evaluated the same way, against the same rubric, so the ranking reflects the role's real priorities instead of whoever interviewed best.
Pick a role preset below, or set custom weights for the three categories.
Enter the skill assessment, rate each competency with evidence for extreme scores, and record notes against the standardized questions.
Each candidate gets a full evaluation summary — strongest and weakest areas, warnings, and interviewer agreement — not just a single number.
Every role preset includes its own rubric bands, competency list, and standardized interview questions. Pick "Custom" to rename the categories, skills, and questions to whatever your client's role needs.
Weights must total 100 percent. Switch the preset or set your own to match the role.
Privacy: Candidate information stays in this browser session unless you download it. Closing the browser or clearing the session may remove unsaved information.
Disclaimer: This tool supports structured evaluation but does not make hiring decisions. It should not be used as the sole basis for employment decisions.
Weights total percent — adjust so they total 100.
Required qualifications
Optional. If any are marked No, the candidate stays in the list with a warning next to their result.
Skill assessment — score each category
Skill total: 0 / 100
Rate each competency
1 = little or no demonstrated ability · 2 = basic ability · 3 = competent · 4 = strong · 5 = expert-level evidence. Evidence is required for a rating of 1 or 5.
Competency total: 0 / 25
Standardized interview questions
Each question ties to one of the competencies above. Evidence notes back up the interviewer scores below.
Structured interview score — each interviewer rates independently, 0–5
Interview average: — / 5
Please complete the following before adding this candidate: